Shash, et al v. Biogen Inc., et al
| VICTOR D. MENASHE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| JEFFREY D. CAPELLO and MICHAEL MCDONNELL |
| NADIA SHASH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and AMJAD KHAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| BIOGEN, INC., MICHEL VOUNATSOS, ALFRED W. SANDROCK, JR. and SAMANTHA BUDD HAEBERLEIN |
| LEONARD I. SHAPIRO, ALEXANDER BONDARENKO, IGOR RABINOVICH and ROMAN SULEYMANOV |
| 22-1773 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Joshua E. Baker for Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan, Sara Fuks for Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan, Phillip C. Kim for Nadia Shash, Jennifer Pafiti for Alexander Bondarenko, Igor Rabinovich and Roman Suleymanov and Robert C. Schubert for Leonard I. Shapiro. [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 11/16/2022 11:28 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Biogen, Inc., Michel Vounatsos, Alfred W. Sandrock, Jr. and Samantha Budd Haeberlein filed by Attorney Audra J. Soloway. Served on 11/10/2022. [22-1773] (AJS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:54 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Biogen, Inc., Michel Vounatsos, Alfred W. Sandrock, Jr. and Samantha Budd Haeberlein filed by Attorney Daniel S. Sinnreich. Served on 11/10/2022. [22-1773] (DS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:56 PM] |
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. Served on 11/07/2022. [22-1773] (RKK) [Entered: 11/07/2022 06:58 AM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan. Brief and Appendix due 12/07/2022 for appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:43 PM]
|
| CORRECTED ORDER * granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan. Brief and Appendix due 01/12/2023 for appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. *Corrected order entered to amend due date for appellants' brief and appendix. [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:57 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 12/13/2022 for appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 11/03/2022 06:53 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash filed by Attorney Laurence M. Rosen. Served on 11/03/2022. [22-1773] (LMR) [Entered: 11/03/2022 04:33 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan filed by Attorney Fu Shek Rocky Li. Served on 11/01/2022. [22-1773] (FRL) [Entered: 11/01/2022 04:54 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 11/15/2022, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Joshua E. Baker for Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan, Sara Fuks for Nadia Shash and Amjad Khan, Phillip C. Kim for Nadia Shash, Audra J. Soloway for Biogen, Inc., Michel Vounatsos, Alfred W. Sandrock, Jr. and Samantha Budd Haeberlein, Jennifer Pafiti for Alexander Bondarenko, Igor Rabinovich and Roman Suleymanov and Robert C. Schubert for Leonard I. Shapiro. [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 11/01/2022 05:27 AM] |
| NOTICE of filing the following transcript(s) in district court by Court Reporter Robert W. Paschal: 05/10/2022, Motion Hearing. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [22-1773] (GAK) [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:14 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash filed by Attorney Sara E. Margolis. Served on 10/31/2022. [22-1773] (SEM) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:33 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash filed by Attorney Swara Saraiya. Served on 10/31/2022. [22-1773] (SS) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:28 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. Served on 10/31/2022. [22-1773] (LMR) [Entered: 10/31/2022 03:53 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Served on 10/31/2022. [22-1773] (LMR) [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:00 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Jennifer Pafiti for Not Parties Alexander Bondarenko, Igor Rabinovich and Roman Suleymanov. Copy of case opening notice issued October 13, 2022. Forwarding address unknown. [22-1773] (ATC) [Entered: 10/28/2022 01:42 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Biogen, Inc., Michel Vounatsos, Alfred W. Sandrock, Jr. and Samantha Budd Haeberlein filed by Attorney William J. Trach. Served on 10/24/2022. [22-1773] (WJT) [Entered: 10/24/2022 03:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash filed by Attorney Robert K. Kry. Served on 10/24/2022. [22-1773] (RKK) [Entered: 10/24/2022 07:21 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #78) filed by Appellants Amjad Khan and Nadia Shash. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 10/31/2022 . [22-1773] (GB) [Entered: 10/17/2022 03:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
