Hategekimana v. Garland
| FRED HATEGEKIMANA, a/k/a Fred Kayitare |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 22-1788 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [22-1788] (ALW) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:52 AM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Fred Hategekimana. Fee and Appearance form due 11/01/2022. Administrative record due 11/28/2022. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [22-1788] (ALW) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hategekimana v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRED HATEGEKIMANA, a/k/a Fred Kayitare | |
| Represented By: | Abeba Attles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Bernard Joseph |
| Represented By: | Anthony Paul Nicastro |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
