Silvia v. NE Health Care Systems Bedford
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND |
| DAVID A. SILVIA |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, NE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS BEDFORD and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, NE Health Care Systems |
| 22-1908 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Amer. w/Disabilities - Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER filed by attorney Michael Field. [22-1908]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (GRC) [Entered: 01/20/2023 02:39 PM] |
ORDER entered. As Appellee United States Department of Veterans Affairs has failed to file a brief, appellee will not be heard at oral argument except by permission of the court. [22-1908] (GRC) [Entered: 01/13/2023 04:45 PM]
|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant David A. Silvia. Number of copies: 1. Served on 11/22/2022. Brief due 01/03/2023 for APPELLEE NE Health Care Systems Bedford and Department of Veterans Affairs. [22-1908] (GRC) [Entered: 12/01/2022 02:58 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1908] (GRC) [Entered: 12/01/2022 02:46 PM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Brief filed by Appellant David A. Silvia. [22-1908] (GRC) [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:55 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #12) filed by Appellant David A. Silvia. [22-1908] (GRC) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
