Laccinole v. International Union of Police Associations
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. LACCINOLE
Defendant / Appellee: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIO
Case Number: 22-1912
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Brief due 05/05/2023 for appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Appendix due 05/05/2023 for appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [22-1912] (CMP) [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:45 PM]
March 22, 2023 MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Served on 03/22/2023. [22-1912] (VAI) [Entered: 03/22/2023 09:21 AM]
March 21, 2023 DUPLICATE NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole filed by Attorney Vincent A. Indeglia. Served on 03/21/2023. [22-1912] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (VAI) [Entered: 03/21/2023 02:55 PM]
March 20, 2023 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole filed by Attorney Vincent A. Indeglia. Served on 03/20/2023. [22-1912] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (VAI) [Entered: 03/20/2023 06:00 PM]
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Brief due 03/20/2023 for appellee International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 02/21/2023 04:17 PM]
February 21, 2023 CORRECTED ORDER* granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Brief due 03/20/2023 for appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. *Corrected order entered to amend the text of the order. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 02/21/2023 04:51 PM]
February 16, 2023 MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Served on 02/16/2023. [22-1912] (CML) [Entered: 02/16/2023 03:39 PM]
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Brief due 02/16/2023 for appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:34 AM]
January 13, 2023 ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Served on 01/13/2023. [22-1912] (CML) [Entered: 01/13/2023 03:55 PM]
January 13, 2023 NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Adam C. Benevides for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO, Patrick T. Kane for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO and Joseph P. Murphy for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 01/13/2023 02:56 PM]
December 23, 2022 NOTICE issued. After 01/06/2023, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Adam C. Benevides for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO, Patrick T. Kane for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO and Joseph P. Murphy for International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 12/23/2022 12:01 PM]
December 8, 2022 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 01/17/2023 for appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 12/08/2022 11:05 AM]
December 8, 2022 DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO. Served on 12/08/2022. [22-1912] (DJT) [Entered: 12/08/2022 01:02 PM]
December 7, 2022 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO filed by Attorney Daniel J. Treuden. Served on 12/07/2022. [22-1912] (DJT) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:53 PM]
November 29, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #43) filed by Appellant Christopher M. Laccinole. [22-1912] (GRC) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Laccinole v. International Union of Police Associations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. LACCINOLE
Represented By: Christopher M. Laccinole
Represented By: Vincent A. Indeglia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS AFL-CIO
Represented By: Adam C. Benevides
Represented By: Paul T. Kane
Represented By: Michael J. Marcello
Represented By: Joseph P. Murphy
Represented By: Brian C. Newberry
Represented By: Daniel J. Treuden
Represented By: Patrick T. Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?