In Re: Castro-Caicedo
Petitioner: GUSTAVO CASTRO-CAICEDO, a/k/a Luis Amaro
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 22-1968
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis with Affidavit filed by Petitioner Gustavo Castro-Caicedo. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1968] (CMP) [Entered: 12/13/2022 01:37 PM]
December 12, 2022 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Gustavo Castro-Caicedo. [22-1968] (CMP) [Entered: 12/13/2022 01:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: Castro-Caicedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GUSTAVO CASTRO-CAICEDO, a/k/a Luis Amaro
Represented By: Gustavo Castro-Caicedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Represented By: David D'Addio
Represented By: Zachary R. Hafer
Represented By: Donald Campbell Lockhart
Represented By: George W. Vien
Represented By: Jennifer H. Zacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?