Nelson Alves v. Montalvo Borgos
Petitioner: LUIS ALBERTO MONTALVO BORGOS
Respondent: NELSON ALVES, Superintendent, MCI-Norfolk
Case Number: 22-1990
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 Public docket note: Nelson Alves is the current Superintendent of MCI-Norfolk. We have substituted him for Gary Roden as the respondent. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [22-1990] (ALW) [Entered: 12/29/2022 02:05 PM]
December 21, 2022 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Application for permission to file a second or successive motion to vacate filed by Petitioner Luis Alberto Montalvo Borgos. [22-1990] (ALW) [Entered: 12/29/2022 01:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nelson Alves v. Montalvo Borgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LUIS ALBERTO MONTALVO BORGOS
Represented By: Luis Alberto Montalvo Borgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NELSON ALVES, Superintendent, MCI-Norfolk
Represented By: Maura Tracy Healey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?