Mahoney v. Krueger
BRIAN E. MAHONEY |
JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, MCFP Springfield |
23-1001 |
January 4, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
General (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION to voluntarily withdraw appellate docket number 23-1001 as an error of law filed by Appellant Brian E. Mahoney. Certificate of service incomplete. [23-1001]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JAW) [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:41 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #10) filed by Appellant Brian E. Mahoney. [23-1001] (JAW) [Entered: 01/04/2023 07:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Mahoney v. Krueger | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: BRIAN E. MAHONEY | |
Represented By: | Brian E. Mahoney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, MCFP Springfield | |
Represented By: | Donald Campbell Lockhart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.