Howell v. MBTA, et al
| CURTIS L. HOWELL |
| MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MASSACHUSETTS REHABILITATION COMMISSION and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-1064 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER mooting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 03/13/2023 01:06 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee MBTA filed by Attorney Sonia L. Skinner. Served on 03/10/2023. [23-1064] (SLS) [Entered: 03/10/2023 11:37 AM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Transcript Report/Order Form filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell. Certificate of service incomplete. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 03/10/2023 08:14 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell. Certificate of service incomplete. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 03/08/2023 04:16 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell. Certificate of service incomplete. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 03/08/2023 04:01 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell to order for lack of jurisdiction [ # 6546635-2 ]. Certificate of service incomplete. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 03/08/2023 03:51 PM] |
|
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Show cause response due 03/02/2023 . [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:47 PM]
|
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #28) filed by Appellant Curtis L. Howell. [23-1064] (JAW) [Entered: 01/17/2023 09:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
