Watson v. Fasano
LAWRENCE BYRON WATSON |
EDWARD J. DOLAN, Commissioner of Probation and DIANE FASANO, Commissioner of Probation |
23-1263 |
March 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
General (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge, granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Lawrence Byron Watson. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 05/22/2023 05:05 PM] |
ORDER entered: Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), it is hereby ordered that Diane Fasano, Acting Commissioner of Probation be substituted for Edward J. Dolan as Respondent-Appellee. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 05/10/2023 05:09 PM] |
ORDER entered. On March 7, 2023 the district court granted petitioner-appellant's request for a certificate of appealability. Pursuant to 1st Cir. R. 22.1 "[i]f the district court grants a certificate of appealability, it must state which issue or issues satisfy the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 (c)(2)." We now transmit copies of appellant's request for a certificate of appealability to the district court and request that it specify as to which issues the certificate was granted. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 05/10/2023 12:15 PM] |
MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Lawrence Byron Watson. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:55 AM] |
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Lawrence Byron Watson. Served on 03/29/2023. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 04/04/2023 03:22 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #40) filed by Appellant Lawrence Byron Watson. Fee due 04/11/2023. [23-1263] (GRC) [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.