Thomas v. Hedderman
CITY OF BOSTON, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN P. SMITH, individually and as employee of Boston Police Department, BRENDAN E. CAVANAUGH, individually and as employee of Boston Police Department and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER |
TRICIA THOMAS |
MARTIN J. HEDDERMAN, individually and as employee of Boston Police Department |
MIRICK, O'CONNELL, DEMALLIE & LOUGEE, LLP |
23-1298 |
March 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/28/2023 for appellant Tricia Thomas. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1298] (JMK) [Entered: 05/19/2023 03:02 PM] |
NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 05/04/2023. Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [23-1298] (JMK) [Entered: 04/20/2023 09:59 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Martin J. Hedderman filed by Attorney Randall F Maas. Served on 04/12/2023. [23-1298] (RFM) [Entered: 04/12/2023 02:08 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Martin J. Hedderman filed by Attorney Edward F. Whitesell, Jr.. Served on 04/12/2023. [23-1298] (EFW) [Entered: 04/12/2023 01:19 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #167) filed by Appellant Tricia Thomas. Transcript Report/Order form due 04/12/2023. [23-1298] (JMK) [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.