Jackson v. Gray
Petitioner / Appellant: GARRET JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee: DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correction Center
Case Number: 23-1487
Filed: June 7, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: General (Habeas Corpus)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2023 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Garret Jackson. Served on 07/28/2023. [23-1487] (ADC) [Entered: 07/28/2023 05:47 PM]
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to request certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Garret Jackson. Memorandum supporting issuance of CAP due 07/31/2023. [23-1487] (JMK) [Entered: 07/25/2023 01:15 PM]
July 22, 2023 MOTION to extend time to request a certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Garret Jackson. Served on 07/22/2023. [23-1487] (ADC) [Entered: 07/22/2023 04:21 PM]
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 47 (Memorandum and Order entered on June 23, 2023 by Judge Gorton denying [41] motion for a certificate of appealability. [23-1487]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (GAK) [Entered: 06/23/2023 02:15 PM]
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealability in this court by 07/24/2023. Date of denial by district court: June 23, 2023. [23-1487] (GAK) [Entered: 06/23/2023 02:38 PM]
June 13, 2023 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Dean Gray filed by Attorney Tara L. Johnston. Served on 06/13/2023. [23-1487] (TLJ) [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:58 AM]
June 9, 2023 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Garret Jackson indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 06/09/2023. [23-1487] (ADC) [Entered: 06/09/2023 05:22 PM]
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER directing district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability. [23-1487] (JMK) [Entered: 06/09/2023 10:30 AM]
June 9, 2023 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Garret Jackson filed by Attorney Alan Campbell. Served on 06/09/2023. [23-1487] (ADC) [Entered: 06/09/2023 05:16 PM]
June 9, 2023 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Garret Jackson. Served on 06/09/2023. [23-1487] (ADC) [Entered: 06/09/2023 05:17 PM]
June 7, 2023 A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Garret Jackson. [23-1487] (JMK) [Entered: 06/07/2023 12:25 PM]
June 7, 2023 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #39) filed by Appellant Garret Jackson. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 06/21/2023. [23-1487] (JMK) [Entered: 06/07/2023 12:22 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jackson v. Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: GARRET JACKSON
Represented By: Alan D. Campbell
Represented By: Garret Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correction Center
Represented By: Tara Lyn Johnston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?