Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
| BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST |
| PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK, KERRI LEWANDOWSKI, LEIGH COWDRICK, MICHAEL J. LAMBERT, THOMAS M. CLOSSON and PFIZER, INC., as successor to Wyeth Pharmaceuticals |
| 23-1591 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| RICO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 10/10/2023 for appellant Brent Andrew Brackett Arbogast. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1481, 23-1591] (AL) [Entered: 08/31/2023 10:35 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Brent Andrew Brackett Arbogast in 23-1591, 23-1481 indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Served on 08/31/2023. [23-1591, 23-1481] (BAA) [Entered: 08/31/2023 06:48 AM] |
ORDER entered: Appeal Nos. 23-1481 and 23-1591 are consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(b)(2). The parties are directed to use the above caption on all future filings related to these cases. [23-1481, 23-1591] (AL) [Entered: 08/29/2023 10:40 AM]
|
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #125) filed by Appellant Brent Andrew Brackett Arbogast. Transcript Report/Order form due 08/09/2023. [23-1591]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AL) [Entered: 07/26/2023 05:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
