In Re: Munir
| HASIM MUNIR |
| PAUL A. SUTTELL, Chief Justice of Rhode Island Supreme Court |
| 23-1605 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee was paid by Petitioner Hasim Munir. Receipt number: 4701000711. [23-1605] (GB) [Entered: 07/28/2023 04:56 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Petitioner Hasim Munir, requesting docket sheet. Certificate of service was not included. [23-1605] (GB) [Entered: 07/27/2023 04:52 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Hasim Munir. Fee due 08/04/2023 . [23-1605] (GB) [Entered: 07/21/2023 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Munir | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: HASIM MUNIR | |
| Represented By: | Hasim Munir |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAUL A. SUTTELL, Chief Justice of Rhode Island Supreme Court | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Robinson Bush |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
