State of Maine v. 3M Company
| E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, f/k/a E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, CHEMOURS COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC., DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., DOW INC. and CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| 3M COMPANY |
| 23-1709 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Tort Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/27/2023 for appellant 3M Company. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1709] (GRC) [Entered: 10/16/2023 03:26 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Steven J. Daroci for State of Maine, Aaron M. Frey for State of Maine, Katherine Tierney for State of Maine, Viola Vetter for State of Maine and Jason Harold Wilson for State of Maine. [23-1709] (GRC) [Entered: 10/12/2023 09:54 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/06/2023, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Scott W. Boak for State of Maine, Steven J. Daroci for State of Maine, Aaron M. Frey for State of Maine, Katherine Tierney for State of Maine, Viola Vetter for State of Maine, Jason Harold Wilson for State of Maine and J. Wylie Donald for E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, Chemours Company, Corteva, Inc. and Dupont De Nemours, Inc.. [23-1709] (GRC) [Entered: 09/22/2023 07:28 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee State of Maine filed by Attorney Benjamin Krass. Served on 09/22/2023. [23-1709] (BAK) [Entered: 09/22/2023 12:12 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant 3M Company. Served on 09/14/2023. [23-1709] (AK) [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:07 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee State of Maine filed by Attorney Kyle McGee. Served on 09/14/2023. [23-1709] (KJM) [Entered: 09/14/2023 05:40 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant 3M Company indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Served on 09/14/2023. [23-1709] (AK) [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:05 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee State of Maine filed by Attorney Robert L. Martin, III. Served on 09/11/2023. [23-1709] (RLM) [Entered: 09/11/2023 08:43 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant 3M Company filed by Attorney Jay S. Geller. Served on 09/08/2023. [23-1709] (JSG) [Entered: 09/08/2023 01:16 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant 3M Company filed by Attorney Russell B. Pierce, Jr., Esq.. Served on 09/08/2023. [23-1709] (RBP) [Entered: 09/08/2023 02:17 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee State of Maine filed by Attorney Matthew F. Pawa. Served on 09/08/2023. [23-1709] (MFP) [Entered: 09/08/2023 04:14 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant 3M Company filed by Attorney Michael A. Scodro. Served on 09/07/2023. [23-1709] (MAS) [Entered: 09/07/2023 05:20 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant 3M Company filed by Attorney Avi M. Kupfer. Served on 09/07/2023. [23-1709] (AK) [Entered: 09/07/2023 05:22 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #50) filed by Appellant 3M Company. Appearance form due 09/14/2023. Docketing Statement due 09/14/2023. Transcript Report/Order form due 09/14/2023. [23-1709] (GRC) [Entered: 08/31/2023 07:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
