Rose v. Davis
| MICHAEL ROSE |
| JACK DAVIS and JOHN H. DAVIS, a/k/a Jack Davis |
| 23-1719 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Contract |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: James D. Cullen for John H. Davis. [23-1719] (GRC) [Entered: 10/12/2023 09:49 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/06/2023, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: James D. Cullen for John Davis. [23-1719] (GRC) [Entered: 09/22/2023 07:44 AM] |
| CORRECTED RESPONSE filed by Appellant Michael Rose to [ # 6590807-2 ]. Served on 09/19/2023. [23-1719] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. . (MR) [Entered: 09/19/2023 05:49 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Michael Rose to [ # 6590807-2 ]. Served on 09/19/2023. [23-1719] (MR) [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:17 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Michael Rose. [23-1719] (MR) [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:35 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellee Jack Davis. Served on 09/12/2023. [23-1719] (JAM) [Entered: 09/12/2023 10:50 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Jack Davis filed by Attorney James A Musgrave. Served on 09/07/2023. [23-1719] (JAM) [Entered: 09/07/2023 12:56 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #29) filed by Appellant Michael Rose. [23-1719 (GRC) [Entered: 08/31/2023 06:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
