Carr v. Carr, et al
| DANIEL E. CARR |
| DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, New Bedford, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Taunton, MA, BETH AMOROSO, LSW, Investigator, RAKHI CARR, BRISTOL COUNTY PROBATE & FAMILY COURT and NANCY STANTON CROSS |
| 23-1728 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered: In an order entered on September 6, 2023 in No. 1:23-cv-11974-FDS (D. Mass.), the district court certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), that this appeal is not taken in good faith. If appellant seeks to challenge the district court's certification, appellant must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) in this court before October 16, 2023 . Accordingly, on or before October 16, 2023 , appellant must either pay the $505 filing fee to the district court or file a motion in this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Failure to take either action will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [23-1728] (AL) [Entered: 09/14/2023 03:23 PM]
|
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carr was denied in the district court by order dated 09/06/2023. Fee due September 28, 2023 . [23-1728] (AL) [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:50 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #10) filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carr. [23-1728] (AL) [Entered: 09/05/2023 04:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
