SEC v. Bendelac
| TRENDS INVESTMENTS INC., BRANDON ROSSETTI, CLINTON GREYLING, LESLIE GREYLING and THOMAS CAPELLINI |
| US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| ROGER BENDELAC |
| 23-1790 |
| October 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchange |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: David M. Scheffler for SEC, J. Lauchlan Wash for SEC, Steven Norman Fuller for Thomas Capellini and Thomas J. McCabe for Thomas Capellini. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 11/27/2023 12:32 AM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Steven Norman Fuller for Not Party Thomas Capellini. Copy of order entered November 1, 2023. Forwarding address unknown. [23-1790] (ATC) [Entered: 11/16/2023 11:56 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for transcript report/order form [ # 6600735-2 ] filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Served on 10/30/2023. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:59 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Steven Norman Fuller for Not Party Thomas Capellini. Copy of notice entered October 25, 2023. Forwarding address unknown. [23-1790] (ATC) [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:39 PM] |
| MOTION for Leave to File a Sur-Reply with an attached Exhibit A filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Served on 11/03/2023. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 11/06/2023 12:29 PM] |
ORDER entered by Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: Defendant-Appellant Roger Bendelac seeks leave of this court to file a sur-reply to the SEC's motion to dismiss this appeal. Bendelac's motion is denied without prejudice to his filing a new motion accompanied by a copy of the proposed sur-reply within 21 days of this order. The court intends to address the motion to dismiss once Bendelac has renewed his motion and tendered the sur-reply, or once the deadline to do so has passed, and the opportunity to make further filings in relation to the motion to dismiss should not be expected. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 11/01/2023 09:56 AM]
|
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Certificate of service was not included. [23-1790]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 10/30/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Roger Bendelac on 10/13/2023. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/25/2023 01:40 PM] |
| NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 11/08/2023 . Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/25/2023 01:44 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 11/08/2023, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: David M. Scheffler for SEC, J. Lauchlan Wash for SEC, Steven Norman Fuller for Thomas Capellini and Thomas J. McCabe for Thomas Capellini. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/25/2023 01:08 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Steven Norman Fuller for Not Party Thomas Capellini. Copy of case opening notice issued October 2, 2023. Forwarding address unknown. [23-1790] (ATC) [Entered: 10/18/2023 02:17 PM] |
| MOTION for Leave to File a Sur-Reply filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/17/2023 04:38 PM] |
| REPLY in Support of its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction [ # 6595699-2 ] filed by Appellee SEC. Served on 10/11/2023. [23-1790]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (PGA) [Entered: 10/11/2023 09:37 AM] |
| OPPOSITION to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction [ # 6595089-2 ] filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Served on 10/03/2023. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/04/2023 01:23 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for motion request for venue transfer to the Southern District of New York [ # 6595135-2 ] filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Served on 09/30/2023. [23-1790]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 10/04/2023 01:17 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee SEC filed by Attorney Paul G. Alvarez. Served on 10/02/2023. [23-1790] (PGA) [Entered: 10/02/2023 09:23 AM] |
| MOTION request for venue transfer to the Southern District of New York filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Certificate of service was not included. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/02/2023 04:36 PM] |
| MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction filed by Appellee SEC. Served on 10/02/2023. [23-1790]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (PGA) [Entered: 10/02/2023 03:35 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #220 ) filed by Appellant Roger Bendelac. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 10/16/2023 . [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 10/02/2023 02:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER entered by Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: Defendant-Appellant Roger Bendelac seeks leave of this court to file a sur-reply to the SEC's motion to dismiss this appeal. Bendelac's motion is denied without prejudice to his filing a new motion accompanied by a copy of the proposed sur-reply within 21 days of this order. The court intends to address the motion to dismiss once Bendelac has renewed his motion and tendered the sur-reply, or once the deadline to do so has passed, and the opportunity to make further filings in relation to the motion to dismiss should not be expected. [23-1790] (ALW) [Entered: 11/01/2023 09:56 AM]