Gupta, et al v. Jaddou, et al
| MONISHA GUPTA and SWAPNIL VIJAY KUMAR GADKARI |
| UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of State |
| 23-1828 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Immigration Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANTS' BRIEF filed by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. Served on 12/06/2023. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 12/14/2023 . Brief due 01/05/2024 for APPELLEES Antony J. Blinken and Ur Mendoza Jaddou. [23-1828, 23-1813] (YCC) [Entered: 12/07/2023 10:01 AM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. Served on 12/07/2023. Five paper copies of the electronically filed appendix must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 12/14/2023. [23-1828, 23-1813] (YCC) [Entered: 12/07/2023 10:10 AM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. Served on 12/07/2023. [23-1828, 23-1813] (BB) [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:11 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, and Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. [23-1828, 23-1813] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was modified to replace an attachment. (BB) [Entered: 12/06/2023 09:48 AM] |
ORDER entered. The brief and appendix filed by appellants Anuja Patel, Nikunj Patel, Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari, and Monisha Gupta on November 28, 2023, are not in compliance. Appellants Anuja Patel, Nikunj Patel, Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari, and Monisha Gupta are ordered to file a conforming brief and appendix by December 11, 2023 . The corrected brief and one copy of the corrected appendix must be served on all parties to the appeal, and the certificate(s) of service must be updated to include the new date of service. The due date for appellees' brief shall run from service of the corrected brief, in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 31. [23-1813, 23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 12/04/2023 05:58 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Antony J. Blinken and Ur Mendoza Jaddou filed by Attorney Alessandra Faso. Served on 11/29/2023. [23-1828] (AF) [Entered: 11/29/2023 04:01 PM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813, Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828. Served on 11/28/2023. [23-1813, 23-1828] (BB) [Entered: 11/28/2023 11:27 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. [23-1828, 23-1813] (BB) [Entered: 11/28/2023 11:30 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Bernard P.H. Wolfsdorf for Monisha Gupta and Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari. [23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 11/09/2023 04:18 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 11/08/2023, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Bernard P.H. Wolfsdorf for Monisha Gupta and Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari. [23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 10/25/2023 03:50 AM] |
|
ORDER entered by Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate these appeals is granted. [23-1813, 23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 10/19/2023 09:31 AM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/28/2023 for appellants Anuja Patel, Nikunj Patel, Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1813, 23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 10/19/2023 09:35 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Antony J. Blinken and Ur Mendoza Jaddou in 23-1813, 23-1828 filed by Attorney Aaron S. Goldsmith. Served on 10/19/2023. [23-1813, 23-1828] (ASG) [Entered: 10/19/2023 03:27 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta filed by Attorney Brad Banias. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1828] CLERK'S NOTE: Party selection was incorrect. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (BB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:34 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellants Monisha Gupta and Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1828] (BB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:35 AM] |
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to consolidate cases filed by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta in 23-1828, Appellants Anuja Patel and Nikunj Patel in 23-1813. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1828, 23-1813] (BB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:47 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Monisha Gupta and Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1828] (BB) [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:36 AM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 10/10/2023 05:10 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #29) filed by Appellants Swapnil Vijay Kumar Gadkari and Monisha Gupta. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 10/24/2023 . [23-1828] (GB) [Entered: 10/10/2023 05:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
