In Re: Soneeya
KATHEENA NEVIA SONEEYA |
JAMES R. BENDER, Acting Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARTHUR BREWER, Program Director and contractual Agent of UMass Correctional Health Program, COMMISSIONER HAROLD W. CLARKE and CAROL A. MICI, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction |
23-1833 |
October 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya filed by Attorney Matthew L. McGinnis. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1833] (MLM) [Entered: 10/16/2023 12:29 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya filed by Attorney Patrick T. Roath. Served on 10/16/2023. [23-1833] (PTR) [Entered: 10/16/2023 12:33 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya. Appearance form due 10/27/2023. [23-1833] (JW) [Entered: 10/13/2023 05:59 PM] |
Filing fee was paid by Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya. Receipt number: A01-39280-627. [23-1833] (JW) [Entered: 10/13/2023 06:07 PM] |
MOTION to file supplemental appendix under seal filed by Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya. Served on 10/12/2023. [23-1833]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JW) [Entered: 10/13/2023 06:20 PM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX (provisionally filed under seal) filed by Petitioner Katheena Nevia Soneeya. Served on 10/12/2023. [23-1833] (JW) [Entered: 10/13/2023 06:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.