Ortiz-Lebron v. Rafael J. Nido Incorporated
| JORGE L. ORTIZ-LEBRON |
| RAFAEL J. NIDO, INC. |
| 23-1874 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered. Upon consideration of motion, it is ordered that the time for Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron to file a brief and appendix be enlarged to and including March 8, 2024 . [23-1874] (GB) [Entered: 11/28/2023 03:07 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1874] (JFQ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 02:28 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron filed by Attorney Jos F. Quetglas Jord n. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1874] (JFQ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 05:11 PM] |
| NOTICE Regarding Notice of Appearance filed by Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1874] (JFQ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 05:16 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1874] (JFQ) [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:15 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 12/26/2023 for appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebr n. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1874] (GB) [Entered: 11/15/2023 03:50 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file an appearance form and docketing statement or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 11/29/2023 . [23-1874] (GB) [Entered: 11/15/2023 08:57 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron filed by Attorney Jose F. Quetglas Jordan. Served on 11/06/2023. [23-1874] CLERK'S NOTE: Party selection was incorrect. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (JFQ) [Entered: 11/06/2023 07:09 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Rafael J. Nido, Inc. filed by Attorney Daniel Quiles Pumarejo. Served on 11/02/2023. [23-1874] (DQ) [Entered: 11/02/2023 10:23 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Rafael J. Nido, Inc. filed by Attorney Mariela Rexach-Rexach. Served on 10/31/2023. [23-1874] (MR) [Entered: 10/31/2023 04:07 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #56) filed by Appellant Jorge L. Ortiz-Lebron. Docketing Statement due 11/14/2023. Appearance form due 11/14/2023. [23-1874] (AL) [Entered: 10/31/2023 12:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ortiz-Lebron v. Rafael J. Nido Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JORGE L. ORTIZ-LEBRON | |
| Represented By: | Jose F. Quetglas Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RAFAEL J. NIDO, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Mariela Rexach |
| Represented By: | Carl E. Schuster |
| Represented By: | Daniel Quiles Pumarejo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
