Cruz Galicia, et al v. Garland
| RONI MAGAEL CRUZ GALICIA, HEIDY ARACELI HERNANDEZ GENIS and R.O.C.H. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 23-1910 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Served on 11/01/2023. [23-1910] (MH) [Entered: 11/01/2023 10:44 AM] |
ORDER granting motion for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-1910] (JMK) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:13 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Madeline Henley. Served on 10/31/2023. [23-1910] (MH) [Entered: 10/31/2023 12:45 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Kevin Patrick MacMurray for Petitioners Roni Magael Cruz Galicia, Heidy Araceli Hernandez Genis and R.O.C.H. Served on 10/27/2023. [23-1910] (JMK) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:18 AM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [23-1910] (JMK) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing fee was paid by Petitioners Roni Magael Cruz Galicia, Heidy Araceli Hernandez Genis and R.O.C.H. Receipt number: A01-39335-645. [23-1910] (JMK) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:17 AM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Roni Magael Cruz Galicia, Heidy Araceli Hernandez Genis and R.O.C.H. Administrative record due 12/11/2023. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [23-1910] (JMK) [Entered: 10/31/2023 09:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
