Davies v. Garland
Petitioner: JAMES DAVIES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Case Number: 23-1954
Filed: November 15, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2023 RESPONSE filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland to to stay removal [ # 6605362-2 ]. Served on 11/22/2023. [23-1954] (KJC) [Entered: 11/22/2023 12:24 PM]
November 21, 2023 MOTION to stay removal filed by Petitioner James Davies. Served on 11/21/2023. [23-1954] (RO) [Entered: 11/21/2023 03:43 PM]
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Petitioner has filed a motion to stay removal. This order is issued in accordance with First Circuit Local Rule 18.0. Removal of the petitioner is hereby stayed for ten business days from the date of this order. The government shall file its response to the motion in accordance with the Local Rule. [23-1954] (JW) [Entered: 11/21/2023 04:11 PM]
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Upon consideration, the motion to withdraw Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro as counsel for Respondent Merrick B. Garland is granted. Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro are hereby withdrawn as counsel in this petition for review, and Respondent will continue to be represented by his remaining counsel of record. [23-1954] (JW) [Entered: 11/21/2023 05:34 PM]
November 21, 2023 MOTION for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Served on 11/21/2023. [23-1954] (KJC) [Entered: 11/21/2023 02:58 PM]
November 21, 2023 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioner James Davies filed by Attorney Randy Olen, Esq.. Served on 11/21/2023. [23-1954] (RO) [Entered: 11/21/2023 02:41 PM]
November 20, 2023 NOTICE of intent to remove petitioner filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Petitioner is scheduled for removal on or after 11/27/2023. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1954] (KJC) [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:22 PM]
November 20, 2023 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Kevin J. Conway. Served on 11/20/2023. [23-1954] (KJC) [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:18 AM]
November 15, 2023 Filing fee was paid by Petitioner James Davies. Receipt number: 4701000724. [23-1954] (JW) [Entered: 11/17/2023 12:33 PM]
November 15, 2023 NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [23-1954] (JW) [Entered: 11/17/2023 12:34 PM]
November 15, 2023 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner James Davies. Appearance form due 12/01/2023. Administrative record due 12/27/2023. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [23-1954] (JW) [Entered: 11/17/2023 12:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Davies v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES DAVIES
Represented By: Randy Olen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Represented By: Kevin James Conway
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?