US Bank, NA v. Pike, et al
| U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-AR8 |
| PETER F. PIKE and CHRISTINA PIKE |
| USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK |
| 23-1968 |
| November 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to stay appeal filed by Appellant U.S. Bank National Association. Served on 01/08/2024. [23-1968] (RJL) [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:34 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Peter L. Hatem for Appellees Peter F. Pike and Christina Pike. Copy of notice issued December 12, 2023. Forwarded to #303 201 US Route 1 Scarborough, ME 04074. [23-1968]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ATC) [Entered: 12/21/2023 12:26 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 01/08/2024, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless hey registers for an appellate ECF account: Peter L. Hatem for Peter F. Pike and Christina Pike. [23-1968] (AL) [Entered: 12/21/2023 02:00 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Peter L. Hatem for Appellees Peter F. Pike and Christina Pike. Copy of case opening notice issued November 22, 2023. Forwarded to #303 201 US Route 1 Scarborough, ME 04074. [23-1968]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ATC) [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:52 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 01/22/2024 for appellant U.S. Bank National Association. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-1968] (AL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 10:41 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 12/26/2023, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Peter L. Hatem for Peter F. Pike and Christina Pike. [23-1968]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AL) [Entered: 12/12/2023 10:38 AM] |
| NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Tammy Martell: 08/17/2023, Bench Trial. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [23-1968] (AL) [Entered: 11/30/2023 03:22 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant U.S. Bank National Association indicating the following transcripts are being ordered: 08/17/2023, Bench Trial. Transcript(s) due 01/29/2024 from Court Reporter Tammy Martell. [23-1968] (ATC) [Entered: 11/28/2023 08:14 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant U.S. Bank National Association filed by Attorney Reneau J. Longoria, Esq.. Served on 11/27/2023. [23-1968] (RJL) [Entered: 11/27/2023 03:11 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant U.S. Bank National Association. Served on 11/27/2023. [23-1968] (RJL) [Entered: 11/27/2023 03:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant U.S. Bank National Association indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 11/27/2023. [23-1968] (RJL) [Entered: 11/27/2023 03:24 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #99) filed by Appellant U.S. Bank National Association. Docketing Statement due 12/06/2023. Transcript Report/Order form due 12/06/2023. Appearance form due 12/06/2023. [23-1968] (AL) [Entered: 11/22/2023 01:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US Bank, NA v. Pike, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-AR8 | |
| Represented By: | Reneau Jean Longoria |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PETER F. PIKE | |
| Represented By: | Peter L. Hatem |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CHRISTINA PIKE | |
| Represented By: | Peter L. Hatem |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Interested party: USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
