Demos v. State of Washington
| JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR. |
| STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| 23-1979 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner John Robert Demos, Jr. Certificate of service was not included. [23-1979] (JW) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:24 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Application for permission to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition filed by Petitioner John Robert Demos, Jr. [23-1979] (JW) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Demos v. State of Washington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR. | |
| Represented By: | John Robert Demos Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF WASHINGTON | |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Ferguson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
