O'Neil, et al v. Canton Police Department, et al
JENNA ROCCO |
MEREDITH O'NEIL, JESSICA SVEDINE, DEANNA CORBY, NICK ROCCO and ROBERTO SILVA |
CANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CANTON, MA, HELENA RAFFERTY, as Chief of the Canton Police Department and in her personal capacity, ROBERT ZEPF, MICHAEL CHIN, ANTHONY PASCARELLI and JOSEPH SILVASY |
23-2062 |
December 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Meredith O'Neil, Jessica Svedine, Deanna Corby, Nick Rocco and Roberto Silva. Brief and Appendix due 03/18/2024 for appellant Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine. [23-2062] (GRC) [Entered: 02/06/2024 05:14 PM] |
MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine. Served on 02/01/2024. [23-2062] (MJR) [Entered: 02/01/2024 03:04 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 02/05/2024 for appellant Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [23-2062] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2023 01:08 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine filed by Attorney Jay M. Wolman. Served on 12/26/2023. [23-2062] (JMW) [Entered: 12/26/2023 03:56 PM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine. Served on 12/26/2023. [23-2062] (MJR) [Entered: 12/26/2023 03:54 PM] |
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of the joint stipulation filed by counsel for the Appellants and counsel for the Appellees, it is hereby ordered that this case be voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) with respect to Plaintiff-Appellant Jenna Rocco only, with each party to bear its own costs. Nothing in this order should be construed to affect the appeal as to Plaintiffs-Appellants Meredith O'Neil, Jessica Svedine, Deanna Corby, Nick Rocco, and Roberto Silva, which remains pending. [23-2062] (GRC) [Entered: 12/22/2023 02:27 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Canton Police Department, Canton, MA, Michael Chin, Anthony Pascarelli, Helena Rafferty, Joseph Silvasy and Robert Zepf filed by Attorney Joseph A. Mongiardo. Served on 12/15/2023. [23-2062] (JAM) [Entered: 12/15/2023 11:50 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Meredith O'Neil, Deanna Corby, Jenna Rocco, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine filed by Attorney Marc J. Randazza. Served on 12/15/2023. [23-2062] (MJR) [Entered: 12/15/2023 03:12 PM] |
STIPULATED MOTION to dismiss Jenna Rocco as party to the appeal filed by Appellant Jenna Rocco. Served on 12/15/2023. [23-2062] (MJR) [Entered: 12/15/2023 03:19 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Canton Police Department, Canton, MA, Michael Chin, Anthony Pascarelli, Helena Rafferty, Joseph Silvasy and Robert Zepf filed by Attorney Douglas I. Louison. Served on 12/11/2023. [23-2062] (DIL) [Entered: 12/11/2023 03:11 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #23) filed by Appellants Deanna Corby, Meredith O'Neil, Jenna Rocco, Nick Rocco, Roberto Silva and Jessica Svedine. Appearance form due 12/26/2023. Docketing Statement due 12/26/2023. [23-2062] (GRC) [Entered: 12/11/2023 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.