Wholey v. Bradley, et al
| JOHN F. WHOLEY, JR. |
| HONORABLE JUDGE HEATHER BRADLEY, Hingham District Court, JUDGE JAMES BYRNE, Hingham District Court, CLERK MAGISTRATE PAUL FULLAM, Hingham District Court, JENNIFER BRADY, Chief Probation Officer, Hingham District Court, JAMES KEEFE, Probation Officer, Hingham District Court, DANIELLE CALLAHAN, Esq., CLERK MAGISTRATE ANDREW QUIGLEY, (Retired) Hingham District Court and CAROLYN BLACKWOOD, Assistant District Attorney, Plymouth County |
| 23-2076 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| General (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 12 - Order declining to issue a Certificate of Appealability. [23-2076] (DO) [Entered: 01/26/2024 10:06 AM] |
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant John F. Wholey, Jr. on 01/19/2024. [23-2076] (GB) [Entered: 01/19/2024 11:51 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 01/30/2024, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless she registers for an appellate ECF account: Andrea J. Campbell for Andrew Quigley, Heather Bradley, James Byrne, Paul Fullam, Jennifer Brady and James Keefe. [23-2076] (GB) [Entered: 01/16/2024 10:09 AM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 01/30/2024. [23-2076] (GB) [Entered: 01/16/2024 10:03 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #7) filed by Appellant John F. Wholey, Jr. Fee due 01/02/2024 . [23-2076] (DO) [Entered: 12/18/2023 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
