Billcliff v. Su
| BARRY BILLCLIFF, d/b/a Barry James |
| JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor |
| 23-2082 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Barry Billcliff. Fee due 01/03/2024 . Administrative record due 01/29/2024 . Copy of petition served on respondent pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [23-2082] (DO) [Entered: 12/20/2023 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Billcliff v. Su | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BARRY BILLCLIFF, d/b/a Barry James | |
| Represented By: | Barry Billcliff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor | |
| Represented By: | Niamh E. Doherty |
| Represented By: | Maia Fisher |
| Represented By: | Nathan C. Henderson |
| Represented By: | Joseph R. Landry |
| Represented By: | Seema Nanda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
