Bonnet, et al v. Whitaker, et al
| LUIS F. BONNET and CARLOS BENITEZ MALDONADO |
| MICHAEL GORDON WHITAKER, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, BILLY NOLEN, Acting Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION |
| 23-2094 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioners Carlos Benitez Maldonado and Luis F. Bonnet filed by Attorney Carlos A. Mercado Rivera LilaVic#2. Served on 12/28/2023. [23-2094] (CAM) [Entered: 12/28/2023 01:28 PM] |
| Public docket note: Michael Gordon Whitaker is the current Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. We have substituted him for Steven Kenneway as the respondent. [23-2094] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2023 03:11 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Carlos Benitez Maldonado and Luis F. Bonnet. Appearance form due 01/10/2024. Administrative record due 02/05/2024. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [23-2094] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2023 03:00 PM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Petitioners Carlos Benitez Maldonado and Luis F. Bonnet. Five paper copies of the electronically filed appendix must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 01/03/2024 [23-2094] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2023 03:28 PM] |
| Filing fee was paid by Petitioners Carlos Benitez Maldonado and Luis F. Bonnet. Receipt number: A01-39503-828. [23-2094] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2023 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
