In Re: Traft
| MICHAEL JOSEPH TRAFT |
| MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS |
| 23-8020 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address at: 26 French Street, Hingham, MA 02043-3031. Certified Mail Return Receipt No. 7020 0640 0001 5477 8232. Documents sent: [ # 6560125-2 ]. [23-8020] (GB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:39 PM] |
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address at: 800 West Street, Unit 2403, Braintree, MA 02184-3867. Certified Mail Return Receipt No. 7020 0640 0001 5477 8256. Documents sent: [ # 6560125-2 ]. [23-8020] (GB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:37 PM] |
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address at: 1 State Street, Suite 1500, Boston, MA 02109-3542. Certified Mail Return Receipt No. 7020 0640 0001 5477 8249. Documents sent: [ # 6560125-2 ]. [23-8020] (GB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:34 PM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing respondent to show cause why an order should not be entered suspending respondent from the office of attorney and counselor of this court. Show cause order served on respondent via certified mails. Certified mail receipt numbers: 7020 0640 0001 5477 8232 , 7020 0640 0001 5477 8256 ,and 7020 0640 0001 5477 8249. Show cause response due 05/05/2023 . [23-8020] (GB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:21 PM]
|
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY CASE docketed. Attorney disciplinary proceedings initiated against Respondent Michael J. Traft. Opening forms sent. [23-8020] (GB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
