Askew v. O'Malley
| I. A. and IVONETTE ASKEW |
| MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 24-1051 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| SSID Title XVI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NINE (9) paper copies of appellant's brief [ # 6627321-2 ] submitted by Appellant Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (NKR) [Entered: 03/12/2024 09:20 AM] |
| FIVE (5) paper copies of appendix [ # 6626085-2 ] submitted by Appellant Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (NKR) [Entered: 03/12/2024 02:18 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Ivonette Askew. Served on 03/05/2024. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 03/13/2024 . Brief due 04/04/2024 for APPELLEE Martin J. O'Malley. [24-1051] (YCC) [Entered: 03/06/2024 04:39 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 03/05/2024 01:25 PM] |
ORDER directing Appellant Ivonette Askew to file a conforming brief. Brief due 03/08/2024 . [24-1051] (JW) [Entered: 03/01/2024 04:58 AM]
|
| APPENDIX filed by Appellant Ivonette Askew. Served on 02/26/2024. Five paper copies of the electronically filed appendix must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 03/08/2024 . [24-1051] (YCC) [Entered: 03/01/2024 08:58 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 03/01/2024 01:07 PM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Ivonette Askew. Served on 02/26/2024. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 02/26/2024 10:51 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 02/26/2024 10:51 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Melissa Lanouette for Ivonette Askew and Kira Treyvus for Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (AVN) [Entered: 02/15/2024 04:49 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 02/14/2024, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Melissa Lanouette for Ivonette Askew and Kira Treyvus for Ivonette Askew. [24-1051] (AVN) [Entered: 01/31/2024 10:47 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 02/28/2024 for appellant Ivonette Askew. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [24-1051] (JW) [Entered: 01/19/2024 11:28 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant I. A.. Served on 01/18/2024. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:14 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant I. A. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 01/18/2024. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:16 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Martin J. O'Malley filed by Attorney Timothy S. Bolen. Served on 01/17/2024. [24-1051] (TSB) [Entered: 01/17/2024 08:48 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Martin J. O'Malley filed by Attorney Luis Pere. Served on 01/17/2024. [24-1051] (LAP) [Entered: 01/17/2024 10:05 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant I. A. filed by Attorney Bryan Konoski. Served on 01/17/2024. [24-1051] (BK) [Entered: 01/17/2024 03:47 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #19) filed by Appellant I. A. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 01/30/2024. [24-1051] (JW) [Entered: 01/16/2024 10:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
