Strahan v. McNamara, et al
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN |
WILLIAM MCNAMARA, TRACY BIRMINGHAM, STEVEN LEE, RENE KELLEY and WILLIAM BREAULT |
24-1056 |
February 21, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 05/06/2024 for appellant Richard Maximus Strahan. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [24-1056] (DO) [Entered: 03/26/2024 02:58 PM] |
NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 03/21/2024 . Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [24-1056] (DO) [Entered: 03/07/2024 09:07 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Tracy Birmingham, Steven Lee and William McNamara filed by Attorney Marrielle Van Rossum. Served on 03/05/2024. [24-1056] (MBV) [Entered: 03/05/2024 07:42 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees William Breault and Rene Kelly filed by Attorney Dona Feeney. Served on 02/21/2024. [24-1056] (DF) [Entered: 02/21/2024 03:43 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #78) filed by Appellant Richard Maximus Strahan. Transcript Report/Order form due 03/06/2024. [24-1056]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (KPC) [Entered: 02/21/2024 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.