Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al v. Arthur of the Family Wittenberg
LORRY BOSS |
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. and JUSTIN CROWLEY, CFO, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
ARTHUR WITTENBERG |
24-1065 |
January 19, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Foreclosure |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER entered: In an order entered on February 15, 2024 in No. 1:23-cv-00335-WES (D.R.I.), the district court certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), that this appeal is not taken in good faith. If appellant seeks to challenge the district court's certification, appellant must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) in this court before March 18, 2024 . Accordingly, on or before March 18, 2024 , appellant must either pay the $605 filing fee to the district court or file a motion in this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Failure to take either action will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of prosecution.. [24-1065] (DO) [Entered: 02/16/2024 11:56 AM] |
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: Text Order by District Judge William E. Smith. [24-1064, 24-1065] (GB) [Entered: 02/16/2024 12:32 PM] |
A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Arthur Wittenberg. [24-1065] (GB) [Entered: 02/12/2024 09:04 AM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. District Court Docket entries: DE#26, #30. [24-1064, 24-1065] (GB) [Entered: 02/06/2024 03:43 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #31) filed by Appellant Arthur Wittenberg. Fee due 02/02/2024 . [24-1065] (AVN) [Entered: 01/19/2024 12:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.