Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
JOHN S. BARTH |
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON, AARON KENNETH BALTES, JONATHAN WILLIAM BROGAN, NORMAN HANSON DETROY PA LLC, PAUL MILLER, MARILYN MILLER, a/k/a Marilyn Maffucci, UNITED OBLIGATIONS LLC, ARM LLC, WAYNE R. DOUGLAS, ANDREW W. MEAD, ELLEN A. GORMAN, JOSEPH M. JABAR, ANDREW M. HORTON, CATHERINE R. CONNORS, STATE OF MAINE and NORMAN, HANSON & DETROY, LLC |
24-1170 |
February 20, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PROOF of service filed by Party John S. Barth. [24-1170] (GB) [Entered: 03/26/2024 01:56 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 05/06/2024 for appellant John S. Barth. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [24-1170] (GB) [Entered: 03/26/2024 06:18 PM] |
PROOF of service indicating notice of appeal, statement of the issues, statement that no transcript is to be ordered, were were served to appellees, filed by Party John S. Barth. [24-1170] (GB) [Entered: 03/26/2024 03:37 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant John S. Barth indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [24-1170] (GB) [Entered: 02/29/2024 04:29 PM] |
Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant John S. Barth on 02/23/2024. [24-1170] (GB) [Entered: 02/26/2024 12:03 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #52) filed by Appellant John S. Barth. Fee due 03/05/2024. [24-1170] (KPC) [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.