Vargas Panchi, et al v. Garland
| MILTON GEOVANNY VARGAS PANCHI, AIDI VERONICA CONDOR LASSO, M. A. V.C. and J. N. V.C. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 24-1172 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of intent to remove petitioner filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Petitioner is scheduled for removal on or after 04/14/2024. Served on 02/23/2024. [24-1172] (NHK) [Entered: 02/23/2024 04:26 PM] |
| MOTION for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Served on 02/23/2024. [24-1172] (NHK) [Entered: 02/23/2024 04:07 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Nehal H. Kamani. Served on 02/22/2024. [24-1172] (NHK) [Entered: 02/22/2024 11:03 AM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Aidi Veronica Condor Lasso, J. N. V.C., M. A. V.C. and Milton Geovanny Vargas Panchi. Administrative record due 04/02/2024. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [24-1172] (JW) [Entered: 02/22/2024 09:50 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Kevin Patrick MacMurray for Petitioners Milton Geovanny Vargas Panchi, Aidi Veronica Condor Lasso, M. A. V.C. and J. N. V.C. Served on 02/19/2024. [24-1172] (JW) [Entered: 02/22/2024 09:57 AM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [24-1172] (JW) [Entered: 02/22/2024 09:59 AM] |
| Filing fee was paid by Petitioners Aidi Veronica Condor Lasso, J. N. V.C., M. A. V.C. and Milton Geovanny Vargas Panchi. Receipt number: A01-39621-911. [24-1172] (JW) [Entered: 02/22/2024 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
