Silva Braganca Lemos, et al v. Garland
| IAGO SILVA BRAGANCA LEMOS, ISABELA RODRIGUES LEMOS BRAGANCA, I. B. L. and N. B. L. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 24-1440 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, the motion to withdraw Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro as counsel for Respondent Merrick B. Garland is granted. Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro are hereby withdrawn as counsel in this petition for review, and Respondent will continue to be represented by his remaining counsel of record. [24-1440] (JW) [Entered: 05/07/2024 10:55 AM]
|
| MOTION for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Served on 05/06/2024. [24-1440] (JSN) [Entered: 05/06/2024 01:40 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Jonathan S. Needle. Served on 05/03/2024. [24-1440] (JSN) [Entered: 05/03/2024 02:04 PM] |
| Filing fee was paid by Petitioners I. B. L., N. B. L., Isabela Rodrigues Lemos Braganca and Iago Silva Braganca Lemos. Receipt number: A01-39795-418. [24-1440] (JW) [Entered: 05/03/2024 08:36 AM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [24-1440] (JW) [Entered: 05/03/2024 08:33 AM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners I. B. L., N. B. L., Isabela Rodrigues Lemos Braganca and Iago Silva Braganca Lemos. Appearance form due 05/17/2024. Administrative record due 06/12/2024. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [24-1440] (JW) [Entered: 05/03/2024 08:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
