Howard v. Bisenius, et al
| DAVID W. HOWARD |
| CYNTHIA JEAN AZIZ, DR. ANDREW KUMIN, MICHAEL G. XAVIER, MICHAEL J. BROOKS, CHRISTOPHER K. BARRY-SMITH, LINDA NUTTING CUMMINGS, PATRICIA M. BRADY, THERESA A. BISENIUS, JACQUELINE BOTCHMAN-LEARY, ROBERT HAIG MINASIAN, JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK, JUDITH N. COWAN, PETER D. ANDERSON, MARY RUDOLPH BLACK and ADRIANNE RAMOS |
| 24-1502 |
| May 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant David W. Howard. Served on 07/15/2024. [24-1502] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (DWH) [Entered: 07/15/2024 09:18 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Katherine L. Connolly for Judith N. Cowan. [24-1502] (JW) [Entered: 07/15/2024 08:30 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Christopher K. Barry-Smith, Jennifer M.R. Ulwick, Theresa A. Bisenius, Mary Rudolph Black and Michael J. Brooks filed by Attorney Michael Shiposh. Served on 07/02/2024. [24-1502] (MJS) [Entered: 07/02/2024 10:12 AM] |
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant David W. Howard on 06/25/2024. [24-1502] (JW) [Entered: 06/27/2024 12:25 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Robert Haig Minasian filed by Attorney Robert H. Minasian. Served on 06/21/2024. [24-1502] (RHM) [Entered: 06/21/2024 11:59 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 07/05/2024, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Katherine L. Connolly for Judith N. Cowan and Michael J. Shiposh for Theresa A. Bisenius, Jennifer M.R. Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black, Michael J. Brooks and Christopher K. Barry-Smith. [24-1502] (JW) [Entered: 06/20/2024 02:26 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Linda Nutting Cummings filed by Attorney John J. O'Connor. Served on 06/20/2024. [24-1502] (JJO) [Entered: 06/20/2024 01:41 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Cynthia Jean Aziz filed by Attorney Cynthia J. Aziz. Served on 06/18/2024. [24-1502] (CJA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 12:38 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Robert Haig Minasian filed by Attorney Robert H. Minasian. Served on 06/18/2024. [24-1502] CLERK'S NOTE: The signature on the document does not match the name of the ECF filer under whose login and password the document was filed. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS (06/24/2024). (CJA) [Entered: 06/18/2024 12:41 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Patricia M. Brady filed by Attorney Kimberly Iverson Tufo. Served on 06/18/2024. [24-1502] (KI) [Entered: 06/18/2024 02:18 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Linda Nutting Cummings filed by Attorney Linda Nutting Cummings, Esquire. Served on 06/18/2024. [24-1502] (LNC) [Entered: 06/18/2024 04:21 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 07/15/2024 for appellant David W. Howard. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [24-1502] (JW) [Entered: 06/04/2024 09:17 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #99) filed by Appellant David W. Howard. Fee due 06/11/2024. [24-1502] (JW) [Entered: 05/28/2024 11:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
