US v. Martinez Lara
| CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL MARTINEZ LARA, a/k/a Cristopher Samuel Martinez Lara |
| UNITED STATES |
| 24-1991 |
| November 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE issued. [24-1991] (GB) [Entered: 12/31/2024 03:59 AM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. 24-1991 Dismissed. [24-1991] (JW) [Entered: 12/09/2024 12:18 PM] |
| CASE submitted. Panel: Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. [24-1991] (KPC) [Entered: 12/19/2024 08:56 AM] |
| NOTICE of default entered: Upon filing a notice of appeal, the appellant is required to pay the $605.00 filing fee to the clerk of the district court in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 3(e). Appellant is presently in default as to this filing. If appellant is indigent and unable to pay the fee, appellant may file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in the district court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24. A compliant request for IFP status consists of a motion and fully completed Form 4, Financial Affidavit. Unless this court is provided with notice of paying the filing fee to the clerk of the district court or filing a motion seeking in forma pauperis status in the district court by December 3, 2024 this appeal will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In addition, appellant is presently in default for failure to file a transcript report/order form. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by December 3, 2024 . Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [24-1991] (JW) [Entered: 11/19/2024 04:40 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Donald C. Lockhart. Served on 11/08/2024. [24-1991] (DCL) [Entered: 11/08/2024 08:56 AM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellee US to order regarding untimely appeal [ # 6679789-2 ]. Served on 11/08/2024. [24-1991] (DCL) [Entered: 11/08/2024 08:57 AM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing parties to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Show cause response due 11/20/2024 . [24-1991] (JW) [Entered: 11/06/2024 02:27 PM]
|
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #383) filed by Appellant Christopher Samuel Martinez Lara. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 11/18/2024. [24-1991] (JW) [Entered: 11/04/2024 11:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Martinez Lara | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES | |
| Represented By: | K. Nathaniel Yeager |
| Represented By: | Donald Campbell Lockhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL MARTINEZ LARA, a/k/a Cristopher Samuel Martinez Lara | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Samuel Martinez Lara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
