Cabral Fortes Tomar v. McHenry
| LUCIO IVALDO CABRAL FORTES TOMAR |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and JAMES R. MCHENRY, III, Attorney General |
| 24-2108 |
| December 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Public docket note: James R. McHenry was named Acting Attorney General of the United States as of January 20, 2025. We have substituted him for Merrick B. Garland, as the respondent. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 01/28/2025 10:58 AM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. Brief and Appendix due 03/28/2025 for petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [24-2108] (ATC) [Entered: 01/10/2025 08:25 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Attorney Virginia Lum has filed a motion to withdraw attorneys Bernard Joseph and Anthony P. Nicastro as counsel of record for respondent Merrick B. Garland. Upon consideration, the motion is allowed, and attorneys Joseph and Nicastro are withdrawn as counsel. Respondent Merrick B. Garland shall continue to be represented by his remaining counsel of record. [24-2108] (ATC) [Entered: 01/10/2025 11:07 AM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. Served on 01/08/2025. [24-2108] (MSH) [Entered: 01/08/2025 12:10 PM] |
| MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Served on 01/08/2025. [24-2108] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incomplete. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (VML) [Entered: 01/08/2025 01:04 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 01/27/2025 for petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), respondent's brief will be due 30 days following service of petitioner's brief and petitioner's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of respondent's brief. [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/18/2024 01:49 AM] |
| ADMINISTRATIVE record. [24-2108] (TS) [Entered: 12/17/2024 09:29 AM] |
|
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge: Petitioners motion to procced in forma pauperis is granted [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/12/2024 04:52 PM]
|
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar was granted in the Court of Appeals. [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/12/2024 04:54 PM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar is pending in the Court of Appeals. [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/10/2024 07:08 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. Served on 12/09/2024. [24-2108] (MSH) [Entered: 12/09/2024 08:53 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Virginia Lum. Served on 12/06/2024. [24-2108] (VML) [Entered: 12/06/2024 02:30 PM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/05/2024 01:07 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar filed by Attorney Maria S. Hwang. Served on 12/05/2024. [24-2108] (MSH) [Entered: 12/05/2024 04:05 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Lucio Ivaldo Cabral Fortes Tomar. Fee and Appearance form due 12/19/2024 . Administrative record due 01/14/2025 . Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [24-2108] (ALW) [Entered: 12/05/2024 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
