In Re: Barnett
| CUSHAW BANACEK BARNETT |
| HELEN HANKS, Commisioner |
| 24-2148 |
| December 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 01/30/2025. Amount due: $600. [24-2148] (GRC) [Entered: 01/16/2025 05:26 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Petitioner Cushaw Banacek Barnett regarding petition filed. [24-2148] (GRC) [Entered: 01/13/2025 06:04 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Cushaw Banacek Barnett. Fee due 01/10/2025. [24-2148] (GRC) [Entered: 12/27/2024 12:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Barnett | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: HELEN HANKS, Commisioner | |
| Represented By: | John M. Formella |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CUSHAW BANACEK BARNETT | |
| Represented By: | Cushaw Banacek Barnett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
