In Re: Rodriguez-Izquierdo
Plaintiff: ANGEL ROLDAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: SAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, VA Compensation and Benefits Unit
Appellant: ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ-IZQUIERDO, SR.
Case Number: 25-1084
Filed: January 27, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Appellant's stipulation of dismissal is denied without prejudice to refiling under the correct caption. Counsel's attention is directed to the caption on this order. [25-1084] (ALW) [Entered: 03/11/2025 04:59 PM]
March 5, 2025 STIPULATED MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellant Ismael Rodriguez-Izquierdo, Sr.. Served on 03/05/2025. [25-1084]. CLERK'S NOTE: The document is incomplete. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS, 03/10/2025. (IR) [Entered: 03/05/2025 11:44 AM]
March 3, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Appellant's stipulation of dismissal is denied without prejudice to refiling under the correct case number and correct caption. [25-1084] (ALW) [Entered: 03/03/2025 08:03 PM]
March 3, 2025 NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Mario F. Gonzalez-Amador for Angel Roldan Rodriguez. [25-1084] (ALW) [Entered: 03/03/2025 08:35 PM]
February 25, 2025 Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Mario F. Gonzalez-Amador for Appellant Angel Roldan Rodriguez. Copy of Notice issued on February 14, 2025. [25-1084] (NKR) [Entered: 02/27/2025 03:19 PM]
February 14, 2025 NOTICE issued. After 02/28/2025, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Mario F. Gonzalez-Amador for Angel Roldan Rodriguez. [25-1084] (ALW) [Entered: 02/14/2025 03:40 PM]
February 4, 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal filed by Appellant Angel Roldan Rodriguez. Served on 02/04/2025. [25-1084]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (IR) [Entered: 02/04/2025 05:32 PM]
January 28, 2025 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #17) filed by Appellant Angel Roldan Rodriguez. Docketing Statement, Appearance form, and Fee due 02/11/2025 . [25-1084] (ALW) [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: Rodriguez-Izquierdo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ-IZQUIERDO, SR.
Represented By: Ismael Rodriguez-Izquierdo Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANGEL ROLDAN RODRIGUEZ
Represented By: Angel Roldan Rodriguez
Represented By: Ismael Rodriguez-Izquierdo Sr.
Represented By: Mario F. Gonzalez-Amador
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAN JUAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, VA Compensation and Benefits Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?