Nelson v. King
| KENNETH P. NELSON |
| MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 25-1141 |
| February 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| SSID Title XVI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Kenneth P. Nelson. Number of copies: 3. Brief due 04/25/2025 for APPELLEE Michelle King. [25-1141] (YCC) [Entered: 03/26/2025 09:30 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Michelle King filed by Attorney Timothy Bolen. Served on 02/14/2025. [25-1141] (TSB) [Entered: 02/14/2025 08:25 AM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Kenneth P. Nelson was granted in the district court by order dated 02/11/2025. [25-1141] (GB) [Entered: 02/13/2025 10:08 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 03/25/2025 for appellant Kenneth P. Nelson. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1141] (GB) [Entered: 02/13/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Public docket note: Michelle King was sworn in as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 21, 2025. We have substituted her for Carolyn W. Colvin, as the appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [25-1141] (GB) [Entered: 02/12/2025 09:35 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #20) filed by Appellant Kenneth P. Nelson. [25-1141] (GB) [Entered: 02/11/2025 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
