Plourde v. Mason, et al
| GLEN PLOURDE |
| KEN MASON, Kennebec County Sheriff, TOM FEENEY, Kennebec County Sheriff's Department Office Manager, GEORGE M. JABAR, II, Kennebec County Commissioner, KENNEBEC COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, KENNEBEC COUNTY, MAINE, BRIAN MACMASTER, former Chief of Investigations for the Maine Office of the Attorney General and STATE OF MAINE |
| 25-1271 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE submitted. Panel: Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge; Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. [25-1271] (DJT) [Entered: 09/08/2025 04:27 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Number of copies: 4. Served on 07/07/2025. [25-1271]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (YCC) [Entered: 07/10/2025 04:23 PM] |
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge; William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge and Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Glen Plourde has filed a "Motion for Stay Pending Appeal" that seeks to stay the filing restrictions pursuant to Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island , 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993) (per curiam), contained in the district court's February 19, 2025 order. See Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (endorsing liberal construction of pro se filings). We apply the traditional four-factor test for stays. Dist. 4 Lodge of the Int'l Ass'n of Machinist & Aerospace Workers Local Lodge 207 v. Raimondo , 18 F.4th 38, 42 (1st Cir. 2021) (outlining the stay-relief factors). Appellant has failed to make a "strong showing" of a likelihood of success in this appeal and has failed to make an availing showing as to the other stay factors. Id. Thus, Appellant has failed to demonstrate entitlement to stay relief. See In re Power Recovery Sys. Inc. , 950 F.2d 798, 804 n.31 (1st Cir. 1991) (stating that the party seeking stay relief bears the burden to demonstrate entitlement to relief and "[f]ailure to meet even one of the criteria justifies denial") (citation omitted). The motion and the request for an ex parte decision contained therein are hereby denied . [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 05/14/2025 11:13 AM]
|
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Glen Plourde indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/22/2025 09:18 AM] |
| AMENDED notice of appeal (doc. #54) filed by Appellant Glen Plourde on 04/14/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/17/2025 03:48 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: DE #54 - Amended Notice of Appeal. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/17/2025 03:47 PM] |
| COURTESY COPY of Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Served on 04/10/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/17/2025 03:49 PM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Served on 04/09/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/14/2025 04:02 PM] |
| MOTION for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Served on 04/10/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/14/2025 04:04 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Brief due 07/07/2025 for appellant Glen Plourde. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/14/2025 04:18 PM]
|
| LETTER regarding non-participation filed by Attorney Knowlton for the Appellees Brian MacMaster and State of Maine. Served on 04/04/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 04/07/2025 01:46 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 05/05/2025 for appellant Glen Plourde. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 03/25/2025 02:48 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: DE #51 - order granting in forma pauperis status on appeal. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 03/20/2025 12:21 PM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Glen Plourde was granted in the district court by order dated 03/20/2025. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 03/20/2025 12:22 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #41) filed by Appellant Glen Plourde. Fee due 04/02/2025 . [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:13 AM] |
| A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Glen Plourde. [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge; William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge and Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Glen Plourde has filed a "Motion for Stay Pending Appeal" that seeks to stay the filing restrictions pursuant to Cok v. Family Court of Rhode Island , 985 F.2d 32, 35 (1st Cir. 1993) (per curiam), contained in the district court's February 19, 2025 order. See Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (endorsing liberal construction of pro se filings). We apply the traditional four-factor test for stays. Dist. 4 Lodge of the Int'l Ass'n of Machinist & Aerospace Workers Local Lodge 207 v. Raimondo , 18 F.4th 38, 42 (1st Cir. 2021) (outlining the stay-relief factors). Appellant has failed to make a "strong showing" of a likelihood of success in this appeal and has failed to make an availing showing as to the other stay factors. Id. Thus, Appellant has failed to demonstrate entitlement to stay relief. See In re Power Recovery Sys. Inc. , 950 F.2d 798, 804 n.31 (1st Cir. 1991) (stating that the party seeking stay relief bears the burden to demonstrate entitlement to relief and "[f]ailure to meet even one of the criteria justifies denial") (citation omitted). The motion and the request for an ex parte decision contained therein are hereby denied . [25-1271] (ATC) [Entered: 05/14/2025 11:13 AM]