US v. Vasquez-Jimenez
| CESAR IVAN VASQUEZ-JIMENEZ, a/k/a El Indio |
| UNITED STATES |
| 25-1329 |
| April 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered: Appellant C sar V squez-Jim nez's "Motion of Intent to Dismiss" is construed as a motion to extend time to file the opening forms and is allowed. Appellant shall file the appearance form, docketing statement, and transcript report/order form, or in the alternative, a motion to dismiss this appeal, on or before October 10, 2025 . Any motion to dismiss the appeal must comply with Fed. R. App. P. 42(d) and 1st Cir. R. 46.6(c)(3). [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 09/10/2025 10:57 AM]
|
| MOTION of Intent to Dismiss filed by Appellant Cesar Ivan Vasquez-Jimenez. Served on 09/08/2025. [25-1329] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JME) [Entered: 09/08/2025 02:23 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos. Served on 08/20/2025. [25-1329] (JCR) [Entered: 08/20/2025 10:09 AM] |
|
ORDER entered: Appellant C sar V squez-Jim nez filed an informative motion concerning dismissal of the case, which is construed as a motion for an extension of time to file the appearance form, docketing statement, and transcript report/order form, or in the alternative, a motion to dismiss this appeal. A motion must state with particularity the relief sought. See Fed. R. App. P. 27(a)(2)(A). The instant motion does not specify a date certain to complete the filings. Notwithstanding this deficiency, the request for extension of time is granted. Appellant shall file the appearance form, docketing statement, and transcript report/order form, or in the alternative, a motion to dismiss this appeal, on or before August 28, 2025 . [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 07/29/2025 04:14 PM]
|
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Cesar Ivan Vasquez-Jimenez. Served on 07/10/2025. [25-1329] (JME) [Entered: 07/10/2025 05:01 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file an appearance form, docketing statement and transcript report/order form or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Appearance form, Docketing Statement, and Transcript report/order form due 06/06/2025 . [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 05/23/2025 05:31 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Ryan R. McCabe for US. [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 05/21/2025 09:49 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 05/20/2025, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Ryan R. McCabe for US. [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 05/06/2025 10:36 AM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: #130 - Electronic order granting in forma pauperis status on appeal. [25-1329]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JW) [Entered: 04/21/2025 02:51 PM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant C sar Iv n V squez-Jim nez was granted in the district court by order dated 04/15/2025. [25-1329] (JW) [Entered: 04/21/2025 03:01 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #119) filed by Appellant C sar Iv n V squez-Jim nez. Fee due 04/24/2025 . Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 04/24/2025 . [25-1329] (GB) [Entered: 04/10/2025 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
