Shumow v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC, et al
| ROSE SHUMOW, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Moses Shumow |
| KEOLIS COMMUTER SERVICES, LLC, MBTA, NATHAN DROWN and BEVERLY, MA |
| 25-1427 |
| May 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Rose Shumow filed by Attorney Austin Freeley. Served on 06/26/2025. [25-1427] (AJF) [Entered: 06/26/2025 08:37 AM] |
| JUDGMENT dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). [25-1427] (GRC) [Entered: 06/26/2025 03:46 PM] |
| MANDATE issued. [25-1427] (GRC) [Entered: 06/26/2025 03:48 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 07/07/2025, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Lindsay L. Jacobsen for MBTA, Keolis Commuter Services, LLC and Nathan Drown. [25-1427] (GRC) [Entered: 06/20/2025 04:00 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Lindsay L. Jacobsen for Appellees MBTA, Keolis Commuter Services, LLC and Nathan Drown. Copy of Case Opening Notice issued May 7, 2025. [25-1427] (NKR) [Entered: 06/09/2025 11:59 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellant Rose Shumow. Served on 05/20/2025. [25-1427] (AJF) [Entered: 05/20/2025 12:34 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #95) filed by Appellant Rose Shumow. Appearance form due 05/21/2025. Docketing Statement due 05/21/2025. Transcript Report/Order form due 05/21/2025. [25-1427] (GRC) [Entered: 05/07/2025 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.