Therrien v. Hearst Television, Inc.
| CHARLES THERRIEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MICHELE SAUNDERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and RICHARD HAYDEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| HEARST TELEVISION, INC. |
| UNITED STATES |
| 25-1487 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, the motion to withdraw Attorney Anna O. Mohan as counsel for Interested Party United States is granted. Attorney Mohan is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record, and the US will continue to be represented by the remaining counsel of record. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 11/03/2025 05:02 PM]
|
| MOTION to withdraw Attorney Anna O. Mohan as counsel filed by Not Party US. Served on 11/03/2025. [25-1487] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (AOM) [Entered: 11/03/2025 11:37 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Not Party US filed by Attorney Sonia Carson. Served on 10/31/2025. [25-1487] (SC) [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:29 AM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 10/29/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 10/29/2025 12:08 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Charles Therrien. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 10/29/2025 11:51 AM] |
|
ORDER directing Appellant Charles Therrien to file a conforming brief, appendix, and provisionally sealed brief, as well as a conforming provisionally sealed supplemental appendix and motion for leave to file by October 29, 2025 . [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 10/22/2025 03:35 PM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Appellee Hearst Television, Inc.'s October 14, 2025, motion seeking an extension of time to file appellee's responsive brief is premature as the appellant's brief has not yet been accepted for filing. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling once the appellant's brief has been accepted for filing. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 10/15/2025 11:25 AM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellee Hearst Television, Inc.. Served on 10/14/2025. [25-1487] (AB) [Entered: 10/14/2025 11:54 AM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Supplemental Appendix filed provisionally under seal filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Number of volumes: 5. Number of copies: 1. Served on 09/25/2025. [25-1487] (YCC) [Entered: 10/22/2025 11:15 AM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Appellant's Brief filed provisionally under seal by Appellant Charles Therrien. Number of copies: 1. Served on 09/25/2025. [25-1487] (YCC) [Entered: 10/22/2025 11:12 AM] |
| MOTION to file brief under seal filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 09/25/2025. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 10/07/2025 12:41 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for electronically filed appendix [ # 6753526-2 ], electronically filed brief [ # 6753525-2 ] filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 09/25/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 09/25/2025 10:39 PM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 09/25/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 09/25/2025 10:32 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Charles Therrien. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 09/25/2025 10:16 PM] |
|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Brief and Appendix due 09/25/2025 for appellant Charles Therrien. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 08/13/2025 04:13 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 08/13/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 08/13/2025 02:51 PM] |
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of the parties' joint motion, it is ordered that the time for Appellant Charles Therrien to file a brief and appendix be enlarged to and including August 27, 2025 . To the extent the motion seeks to extend the other briefing deadlines, the motion is denied without prejudice as premature because the appellant's brief has not been accepted for filing. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(a)(1) and 1st Cir. 31.0(a)(1). [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 07/15/2025 10:49 AM]
|
| JOINT MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 07/09/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 07/09/2025 12:32 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Not Party US filed by Attorney Daniel Tenny. Served on 07/01/2025. [25-1487] (DT) [Entered: 07/01/2025 12:06 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Not Party US filed by Attorney Anna Mohan. Served on 07/01/2025. [25-1487] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AOM) [Entered: 07/01/2025 12:03 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Bonnie Devany for US, Cristen C. Handley for US and James J. Reardon, Jr. for Michele Saunders and Richard Hayden. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 06/23/2025 04:42 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 07/28/2025 for appellant Charles Therrien. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 06/18/2025 03:49 PM] |
| NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Jessica Michael Leonard: 04/16/2025, Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 06/18/2025 03:47 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 06/20/2025, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Matthew R. Greenfield for Hearst Television, Inc., Kristen Hauser for Hearst Television, Inc., Bonnie Devany for US, Cristen C. Handley for US and James J. Reardon, Jr. for Michele Saunders and Richard Hayden. [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 06/06/2025 08:52 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:24 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Hearst Television, Inc. filed by Attorney Andrea R. Butler. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (AB) [Entered: 06/03/2025 05:33 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Hearst Television, Inc. filed by Attorney Jonathan R. Donnellan. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (JD) [Entered: 06/03/2025 05:09 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ordered: 04/16/2025, Motion for Summary Judgment. Transcript due 08/04/2025 from Court Reporter Jessica Michael Leonard [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:41 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Charles Therrien filed by Attorney Max S. Roberts. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (MSR) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:32 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Charles Therrien filed by Attorney YITZCHAK KOPEL. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:29 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Charles Therrien indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 06/03/2025. [25-1487] (YK) [Entered: 06/03/2025 04:27 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #157) filed by Appellant Charles Therrien. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 06/04/2025 . [25-1487] (ATC) [Entered: 05/21/2025 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
