Doe v. Brown, et al
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: JAYLEN BROWN, BOSTON CELTICS, MARCUS SMART and JAYSON TATUM
Case Number: 25-1565
Filed: June 13, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2025 CORRECTED ORDER* denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jane Doe. *Corrected order issued as the filing fee was paid in this case. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 12/05/2025 03:31 PM]
December 5, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 12/05/2025 03:08 PM]
November 13, 2025 Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Jane Doe. Copy of Appellant's motion filed September 26, 2025. [25-1565] (NKR) [Entered: 11/17/2025 04:26 PM]
October 6, 2025 Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Jane Doe. Copy of Order entered September 15, 2025. [25-1565] (NKR) [Entered: 10/15/2025 10:56 AM]
September 26, 2025 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [25-1565]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (GRC) [Entered: 09/30/2025 12:34 PM]
September 15, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Upon consideration of Appellant's motion, and upon review of the record, the default judgment entered on on September 4, 2025, is hereby vacated in view of Appellant having paid the filing fee in the district court on September 9, 2025 . The time for Appellant to file a response to Appellee's motion for summary disposition is enlarged to and including September 29, 2025. To the extent that Appellant seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this appeal, Appellant may file a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, on or before September 29, 2025 . [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 09/15/2025 02:30 PM]
September 9, 2025 MOTION to dismiss Jaylen Brown as party to the appeal filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 09/09/2025 03:51 PM]
September 9, 2025 MOTION to reconsider judgment case defaulted [ # 6748575-2 ] filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 09/09/2025 03:50 PM]
September 4, 2025 JUDGMENT dismissing case in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Defaulted. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 09/04/2025 05:21 PM]
August 22, 2025 NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Mary L. Nguyen for Jayson Tatum. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 08/22/2025 03:02 PM]
August 15, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Appellees Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart, and Jayson Tatum's unopposed motion to stay briefing pending the court's decision on the motion for summary disposition is granted. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 08/15/2025 03:51 PM]
August 15, 2025 DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Boston Celtics. Served on 08/15/2025. [25-1565] (KPC) [Entered: 08/15/2025 02:35 PM]
August 14, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Marcus Smart filed by Attorney Sara E. Silva. Served on 08/14/2025. [25-1565] (SES) [Entered: 08/14/2025 08:53 AM]
July 28, 2025 MOTION to stay Briefing Schedule Pending Resolution of L.R. 27(c) Motion for Summary Disposition filed by Appellees Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart and Jayson Tatum. Served on 07/28/2025. [25-1565] (JLS) [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:10 PM]
July 28, 2025 MOTION for summary disposition filed by Appellees Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart and Jayson Tatum. Served on 07/28/2025. [25-1565] (JLS) [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:08 PM]
July 25, 2025 NOTICE issued. After 08/08/2025, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Mary L. Nguyen for Jayson Tatum. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/25/2025 02:53 PM]
July 23, 2025 Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Jane Doe. Copy of Appellee's Briefing Notice issued July 7, 2025. [25-1565] (NKR) [Entered: 07/28/2025 01:24 PM]
July 21, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Jaylen Brown filed by Attorney J.W. Carney, Jr.; Nathaniel Carney. Served on 07/21/2025. [25-1565] (NC) [Entered: 07/21/2025 06:44 PM]
July 21, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Jayson Tatum and Marcus Smart. Brief due 09/02/2025 for appellee Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart and Jayson Tatum. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/21/2025 04:49 PM]
July 17, 2025 MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees Jayson Tatum, Marcus Smart, Jaylen Brown and Boston Celtics. Served on 07/17/2025. [25-1565] (JLS) [Entered: 07/17/2025 03:25 PM]
July 17, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Jayson Tatum filed by Attorney Joshua L. Solomon. Served on 07/17/2025. [25-1565] (JLS) [Entered: 07/17/2025 09:24 AM]
July 16, 2025 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: The district court denied appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") on July 16, 2025 in Docket No. 1:24-cv-11561-LTS (D. Mass.) Accordingly, appellant must either pay the $605 filing fee to the clerk of the district court or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a fully completed Form 4 financial affidavit. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). A copy of Form 4 is provided to the appellant with this order. If payment has been made, the appellant must submit a copy of the receipt, referencing the above docket number, to this court. The failure to take either action by August 15, 2025 and provide this court with proof thereof, will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 3.0(b). [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/16/2025 05:43 PM]
July 16, 2025 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 122 (Order on Motion). [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/16/2025 12:04 PM]
July 7, 2025 APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Jane Doe. Served on 07/01/2025. Brief due 07/31/2025 for APPELLEE Boston Celtics, Jaylen Brown, Marcus Smart and Jayson Tatum. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/07/2025 12:07 PM]
July 3, 2025 Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Jane Doe. Copy of Case Opening Notice issued June 17, 2025. [25-1565] (NKR) [Entered: 07/09/2025 11:50 AM]
July 3, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Boston Celtics filed by Attorney Jamie Ehrlich. Served on 07/03/2025. [25-1565] (JE) [Entered: 07/03/2025 10:32 AM]
July 3, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Boston Celtics filed by Attorney Benjamin M. McGovern. Served on 07/03/2025. [25-1565] (BMM) [Entered: 07/03/2025 10:30 AM]
July 3, 2025 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Boston Celtics filed by Attorney Keith P. Carroll. Served on 07/03/2025. [25-1565] (KPC) [Entered: 07/03/2025 10:28 AM]
July 2, 2025 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 117 and 119. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/02/2025 04:46 PM]
July 2, 2025 NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 07/16/2025. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/02/2025 04:27 PM]
July 2, 2025 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 08/11/2025 for appellant Jane Doe. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 07/02/2025 04:18 PM]
June 17, 2025 DUPLICTE NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [25-1565] (GRC) [Entered: 06/20/2025 05:30 PM]
June 17, 2025 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #110) filed by Appellant Jane Doe. Fee due 07/01/2025. [25-1565]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to replace an attachment. (GRC) [Entered: 06/17/2025 05:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Doe v. Brown, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Represented By: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAYLEN BROWN
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Gaudet
Represented By: J. W. Carney Jr.
Represented By: Nathaniel Carney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOSTON CELTICS
Represented By: Benjamin M. McGovern
Represented By: Jamie Ehrlich
Represented By: Keith P. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARCUS SMART
Represented By: Sara E. Silva
Represented By: Mitchell B. Schuster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAYSON TATUM
Represented By: Joshua Louis Solomon
Represented By: Mary L. Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?