Merchia v. Lamb and Associates, P.C., et al
| PANKAJ MERCHIA |
| LAMB AND ASSOCIATES, PC, MARTIN LAMB, MARCUS & MILLICHAP, INC., BEREL KRUG and PASCACK VA GROUP, LLC |
| HARRISON KLEIN |
| 25-1608 |
| June 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Contract |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia is pending in the Court of Appeals. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 08/28/2025 09:36 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia. Served on 08/13/2025. [25-1608] (GB) [Entered: 08/25/2025 10:00 AM] |
ORDER entered. Upon consideration, Appellant Pankaj Merchia's motion seeking leave to file the motion to proceed in forma pauperis instanter is allowed. Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is accepted for filing on this date. [25-1608] (GB) [Entered: 08/25/2025 09:53 AM]
|
| MOTION for leave to file motion instanter and MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia. Served on 08/13/2025. [25-1608] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incomplete. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (PM) [Entered: 08/14/2025 01:11 AM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 180 - Electronic order denying motion for in forma pauperis as not taken in good faith. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:11 PM] |
|
ORDER entered: In an order entered June 26, 2025, in civil case 4:20-cv-40100-IT D. Mass., the district court certified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A) that the appeal is not taken in good faith. If appellant seeks to challenge the district court's certification, appellant must file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5) in this court before August 11, 2025 . Accordingly, on or before August 11, 2025 , appellant must either pay the $605 filing fee to the district court or file a motion in this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). Failure to take either action will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 07/10/2025 03:19 PM]
|
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia was denied in the district court by order dated 06/26/2025. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 07/10/2025 03:20 PM] |
| NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 07/24/2025 . Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 07/10/2025 03:22 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #174) filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 07/09/2025 . [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 06/25/2025 03:41 PM] |
| A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Pankaj Merchia. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 06/25/2025 03:47 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 176 - Amended Notice of Appeal. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 06/25/2025 03:53 PM] |
| AMENDED notice of appeal (doc. #176) filed by Appellant Pankaj Merchia on 06/23/2025. [25-1608] (AVN) [Entered: 06/25/2025 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
