Cooke v. Yates
| DAVID L. COOKE |
| SHERIFF DEPUTY YATES |
| 25-1777 |
| August 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Assault, Libel & Slander |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE issued. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 11/12/2025 08:37 AM] |
ORDER entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge and Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. Plaintiff's "Amended Case Open Response," construed as a petition for panel rehearing is denied. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 11/03/2025 02:23 PM]
|
| AMENDED RESPONSE filed by Appellant David L. Cooke to the court's orders dated September 17, 2025 [ # 6751645-3 ], September 18, 2025 [ # 6751745-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 10/27/2025 04:25 PM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge and Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. 25-1777 Dismissed [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:33 PM] |
| CASE submitted. Panel: David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge; Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. [25-1777] (KPC) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:14 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant David L. Cooke to the court's orders dated September 17, 2025 [ # 6751645-3 ], and September 18, 2025 [ # 6751745-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 09/29/2025 03:01 PM] |
| DUPLICATE COPY of response filed by Appellant David L. Cooke to the court's orders dated September 17, 2025, and September 18, 2025 filed by Appellant David L. Cooke. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 09/29/2025 03:02 PM] |
|
ORDER entered. Appellant David L. Cooke's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice to refiling a compliant financial affidavit form. Appellant's request that the court extend all deadlines by 30 days is also denied without prejudice to refiling. Should Appellant wish to extend a deadline in the appeal, Appellant may request an extension of that specific deadline. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 09/18/2025 03:42 AM]
|
|
ORDER to Show Cause entered. It is hereby ordered that Appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by October 1, 2025 may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 09/17/2025 03:26 PM]
|
| MOTION for Extension of Time for All Court Transactions, and MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant David L. Cooke. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 09/10/2025 04:02 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #45) filed by Appellant David L. Cooke. Fee due 08/26/2025 . [25-1777] (GB) [Entered: 08/12/2025 08:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cooke v. Yates | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID L. COOKE | |
| Represented By: | David L. Cooke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SHERIFF DEPUTY YATES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
