Ruiz-Romero v. Dep't of Labor of USA, et al
| ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO |
| US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE |
| 25-1931 |
| September 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Amer. w/Disabilities - Employment |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE submitted. Panel: David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge; Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge. [25-1931] (DJT) [Entered: 01/02/2026 09:21 AM] |
| MOTION to request the court to strike from the record the motion of the United States of first appearance and to notify the attorney general in Puerto Rico for a proper appellee briefing filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 12/29/2025 03:44 PM] |
| LETTER regarding decision not to file responsive brief on behalf of defendant-appellees because they are not properly considered parties to this appeal, since they were never served with summons in the district court filed by Attorney Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos for Appellees United States Attorneys Office and US Department of Labor. Served on 12/08/2025. [25-1931] (JCR) [Entered: 12/08/2025 03:18 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for letter filed [ # 6770924-2 ] filed by Appellees United States Attorneys Office and US Department of Labor. Served on 12/08/2025. [25-1931] (JCR) [Entered: 12/08/2025 04:22 PM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees United States Attorneys Office and US Department of Labor. Served on 12/03/2025. [25-1931] (JCR) [Entered: 12/03/2025 09:22 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees United States Attorneys Office and US Department of Labor filed by Attorney Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos. Served on 12/03/2025. [25-1931] (JCR) [Entered: 12/03/2025 09:21 AM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellees United States Attorney's Office and US Department of Labor. Brief due 01/02/2026 for appellees US Department of Labor and United States Attorneys Office. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 12/03/2025 09:33 AM]
|
| MOTION for Court of Appeals to order district court for a ruling on appellant's motion to appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 11/03/2025 02:48 PM] |
| Supplemental Amendment Complaint and Petition filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Certificate of service was not included. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 11/03/2025 02:51 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Number of copies: 4. Served on 10/26/2025. Brief due 12/03/2025 for APPELLEE US Department of Labor and United States Attorneys Office. [25-1931] (YCC) [Entered: 11/04/2025 01:48 PM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Number of copies: 1. Served on 10/26/2025. [25-1931] (YCC) [Entered: 11/04/2025 02:00 PM] |
| A review of the district court docket indicates that a request to proceed in forma pauperis is pending for Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 10/02/2025 10:24 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 11/12/2025 for appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 10/02/2025 10:27 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #13) filed by Appellant Ernesto Ruiz-Romero. Fee due 10/14/2025 . [25-1931] (GB) [Entered: 09/30/2025 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
