Byrd v. Mott MacDonald Group, Inc.
| KENNETH BYRD |
| MOTT MACDONALD GROUP, INC. |
| 25-1972 |
| October 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Labor Family Medical Leave Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file paper copies filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Paper copies of the brief and Paper copies of the appendix are due April 6, 2026 for Kenneth Byrd. [25-1972] (AL) [Entered: 03/31/2026 09:05 PM]
|
| FIVE (5) paper copies of appendix [ # 6794348-2 ] submitted by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. [25-1972] (SRS) [Entered: 04/10/2026 06:49 PM] |
| NINE (9) paper copies of appellant's brief [ # 6794335-2 ] submitted by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. [25-1972] (SRS) [Entered: 04/10/2026 06:47 PM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file paper copies of the electronically submitted brief and appendix filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 03/25/2026. [25-1972] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (LHW) [Entered: 03/25/2026 07:03 PM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 03/17/2026. Five paper copies of the electronically filed appendix must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 03/25/2026. [25-1972] (NP) [Entered: 03/18/2026 04:12 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 03/17/2026. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 03/25/2026 . Brief due 04/16/2026 for APPELLEE Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. [25-1972] (NP) [Entered: 03/18/2026 03:53 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. [25-1972] (DMQ) [Entered: 03/17/2026 09:02 PM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 03/17/2026. [25-1972] (DMQ) [Entered: 03/17/2026 08:58 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. [25-1972] (DMQ) [Entered: 03/17/2026 08:56 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. filed by Attorney Christina Capo. Served on 03/17/2026. [25-1972] (CC) [Entered: 03/17/2026 10:55 AM] |
|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Brief and Appendix due 03/17/2026 for appellant Kenneth Byrd. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [25-1972] (AVN) [Entered: 02/20/2026 11:09 AM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 02/19/2026. [25-1972] (LHW) [Entered: 02/19/2026 08:41 PM] |
|
ORDER entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge: Appellant Kenneth Byrd's motion to stay briefing is denied. Appellant's opening brief is due fourteen days from the date of this order. [25-1972] (AVN) [Entered: 02/17/2026 04:32 PM]
|
| REPLY filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd to response [ # 6769054-2 ]. Served on 12/08/2025. [25-1972] (LHW) [Entered: 12/08/2025 09:56 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. filed by Attorney Sara E. Kniaz. Served on 12/02/2025. [25-1972] (SK) [Entered: 12/02/2025 04:24 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellee Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. to motion [ # 6767225-2 ]. Served on 12/01/2025. [25-1972] (MDF) [Entered: 12/01/2025 04:13 PM] |
| MOTION to stay and/or Continue Briefing Schedule filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 11/21/2025. [25-1972] (LHW) [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:30 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. filed by Attorney Matthew D. Freeman. Served on 10/29/2025. [25-1972] (MDF) [Entered: 10/29/2025 09:59 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/25/2025 for appellant Kenneth Byrd. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-1972] (AVN) [Entered: 10/16/2025 12:02 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Byrd filed by Attorney Laura H. White. Served on 10/16/2025. [25-1972] (LHW) [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:25 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Byrd filed by Attorney Danielle Quinlan. Served on 10/16/2025. [25-1972] (DMQ) [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:02 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Served on 10/16/2025. [25-1972] (DMQ) [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:02 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #57) filed by Appellant Kenneth Byrd. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 10/29/2025 . [25-1972] (AVN) [Entered: 10/15/2025 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Byrd v. Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KENNETH BYRD | |
| Represented By: | Laura Honold White |
| Represented By: | Danielle Marie Quinlan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MOTT MACDONALD GROUP, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Joshua Scott |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Freeman |
| Represented By: | Sara Kniaz |
| Represented By: | Christina Capo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
